Tuesday, August 16, 2005

Summer ends, time to assess the summer reading lists

Back in May, as the summer season was coming to a start I did some writing on summer reading lists. As the summer season comes to an end, and a new school year is about to start, it seems a good time to revisit that and look at some stories to see how things are progressing. Unfortunately, it seems progress has not been that good. Initially I was going to post this to my other blog, but given that I did the writing here in May, it seemed a good idea to use this as a small follow-up, plus reading issues are always relevant to librarians.

First, there is Florida, which seems to be doing its best to limit reading, or simply make it something less than desirable. Allow me to illustrate.

On July 29, 2005, the St. Petersburg Times (FL) reported that there is a statewide effort to intensify reading at the expense of elective classes. As if neglecting their poor students was not bad enough (see below), now they take the fun out of reading. Basically, the tactic used is to add more time for reading classwork at the expense of elective classes like music, vocational education, and Junior ROTC. Here is one example:

"At Pinellas County's Boca Ciega High School, two foreign language teachers and one physical education position were eliminated to make room for a new reading program that targets 800 students. That's almost nine times as many students as last year.

'We're going to overwhelm our students with reading strategies,' Principal John Leanes said of his school's take-no-prisoners approach to literacy."

I don't think we need to argue much about the need to teach foreign languages in our schools, so taking that out, even with the good intention to foster more reading, is simply not the answer. As for physical education, I think the fact that the United States faces a crisis in health in terms of obesity in children speaks for itself as to why eliminating such positions is not a good idea. So, going to war for literacy, while it sounds very noble, and we do want to encourage literacy, is not a good idea if it becomes an unbalanced approach that neglects the making of students as well rounded individuals.

Then, going back to Florida, The Sun-Sentinel for August 1, 2005, reports that many schools only give reading lists to their brightest students. According to the report, "fearing their low-performing students will not buy books or get parental support needed to enforce nightly reading time, most Palm Beach County schools have been mandating summer reading lists only for their best students: those in honors, Advanced Placement and International Baccalaureate classes." This sounds like excuses for tracking, something that should have gone the way of the dinosaur. They claim that parents will be unsupportive and that funds may be lacking. Let's grant that some parents can be unsupportive (not all parents are, shall we say ideal?). And yes, funding can be tight in schools. However, using this as a way to have lower expectations from part of the student population is a cause for concern. These students need reading as much if not more than the bright ones. There is a simple principle in education: expect the best from all your students. You should teach to reach all of them, and if you expect the best, they will often rise to meet the expectations. In this case, by failing to have high expectations for all students, and disguising it as "well, their folks probably don't read anyways or won't buy them books," they are neglecting a segment of their student population, and doing so in a condescending way.

Meanwhile, in Maryland and Virginia, reading scores seem to be stagnant for adolescents, according to The Washington Post for August 1, 2005. Their solution is to shift more efforts in reading to their middle school students.

"New data from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, billed as the nation's report card, show that the typical 13-year-old could read no better in the 2003-04 school year than the student's counterpart five years earlier. Nine-year-olds, however, showed significant gains."

This is an effort to fill a gap since reading education has been mostly focused in early childhood or in high school (due to graduation standards and testing). The article goes on to describe some efforts to address this issue of middle schoolers' reading needs. For example,

"Such efforts are intensifying across the state. In February, Virginia sponsored a reading leadership institute for principals, teachers and other educators at middle schools in nine school systems.

In the District, Superintendent Clifford B. Janey is pushing for year-round testing to pinpoint struggling students. His efforts seem to focus on the entire school system, not just middle grades."

I think it is important to point out that it is necessary to focus on the entire school system when it comes to reading, not just on some grades or some students. Principal Mark King in Prince George County states, "When the children see that you expect more, they'll try to reach those levels." Maybe someone needs to send his words to those educators in Florida neglecting some of their students.

On a final note, many students are coming back from the summer. Many of them had some form of reading homework or list. I am sure many teachers may want to assign book reports to assess the reading. However, how about some alternatives to the book report instead. For high school level, here is an article which may be of interest. I am not linking since it is behind an archive, but here is the citation:

Mitchell, Diana. "Fifty Alternatives to the Book Report (Teaching Ideas)." English Journal 87.1 (January 1998): 92-95.

The article features a series of alternative writing ideas to respond to reading from creating a childhood for a character to an invitation to a talk show. There are even suggestions for poetry and even music selections, so the article seems to provide something to address the needs of different learners. A good set of teaching ideas.

Monday, August 15, 2005

Article from Collection Building on Collection Evaluation

This article is meant to be a guide for librarians, but I would also recommend it for library school classes on collection development and evaluation. I bet that some of those classes have it on their reading lists already or may be adding it soon. I will provide a summary of some ideas and add some observations here and there. Please see the end of the post for the specific citation.

The article addresses the following question:

"How do librarians ensure, however, that they are building useful collections that will provide a good return on their financial investments? By evaluating their current collections, librarians may better manage future collection development" (92).
First, the article, written by Jim Agee, argues for the importance of collection evaluation. It states that a subject librarian who is ignorant of his/her collections is undermining future collection development. Thus, the author argues, "finding time to review the collection is difficult but often necessary" (93). In my short experience as a professional librarian, I can testify that finding the time to evaluate your collection can be challenging given other duties librarians have. I rush to note that I have not been resting on the proverbial laurels; when it comes to collection management, I have been active adding to the collection and deselecting. Also, I have engaged with some of the faculty to learn about their needs and the needs of their students. I have done this along with my other public services duties. Now, if it feels like I am justifying myself a bit, well, maybe I am. I want to show that evaluation can be done, even if it is done in a gradual way, in stages. Overall, I think it requires a good balancing act and some commitment. To new librarians out there I say to figure out early how to manage your time and do a little at a time. I quickly learned that for some things, you can always live to fight another day. Librarianship in some way is like guerrilla warfare. (hmm, I wonder if the nickname "Guerrilla Librarian" is taken? Maybe my next blog? It does sound cool in Spanish too: "Bibliotecario Guerrillero." I may have to make a claim.)

Back to the article, the author observes that evaluation is necessary given the increase in access and use of electronic resources. Being aware of current holdings means being that you are better informed when making decisions about new electronic resources. Librarians need to keep in mind that because electronic information is expensive that this translates into less funding for print resources.

The article then discusses approaches to conducting a collection evaluation. The first approach is a user-centered evaluation. When doing this, the librarian is looking at library user data. Methods vary from using bibliographies from student research papers to surveys and questionnaires. In my little realm, I have been interested and curious in doing some kind of citation analysis from student research papers to see how our collections are doing. My personal interest comes more from an instruction point of view: I want to see what resources students that come in for library instruction are using. I think this would help me in assessing the instructional program. However, this information can also help me evaluate the collection. This is a good example of doing more than one thing at a time (the business people likely use the buzzword "multi-tasking"). At the moment, a formal version of this idea "sits" on my cue of long term things to do. It is something I want to work on down the road.

The second approach presented in the article is a physical assessment of the collection. This is a collection-centered approach, and it is a contrast to the first approach. This approach is labor intensive because the librarian has to go into the collection, look at the materials, and determine if an item should remain in the collection or not. A secondary result of this approach is the option to do deselection as needed a.k.a. as weeding.

The third approach is assessment of specific subject support. This is what most academic librarians, myself included do. However, other librarians do it as well. A wide variety of methods can be used here from citation analysis for journal holdings to looking at ILL requests. While the article tries to make this a separate category, as I understand it, the previous two approaches can come into this third option as well. Mr. Agee writes, "by recognizing the variety of evaluative approaches and adapting them to local needs and standards, librarians have powerful and effective techniques to produce specific and very meaningful assessment results" (94). Again, here is the idea that librarians have to be people ready to adapt. One small example from my experience: as Arts and Humanities Librarian at my library, Music is one of my areas. My university offers classes in Music Appreciation and History; it is a small program within Humanities. However, within that, the offerings in Jazz are very strong. As a result, Jazz is one of the areas I pay close attention to in making my selections and managing the collections in Music.

The article is written in simple and plain language. It is not a technical article, and I get the feeling that many library veterans know this stuff by heart. However, for younger librarians and for library students, this is a short informative piece with practical information. The article includes a good list of references as well for further reading.

Citation:

Agee, Jim. "Collection Evaluation: a Foundation for Collection Development." Collection Building 24.3 (2005): 92-95.

It is avaible electronically through Emerald for libraries that may have access to that service.

Friday, August 12, 2005

Booknote: The Complete Peanuts: 1955-1956

Title: The Complete Peanuts: 1955-1956
Author: Charles Schultz
Publication Information: Seattle, WA: Fantagraphic Books, 2004
ISBN: 1-56097-647-0
Genre: Nonfiction
Subgenre: Humor, comic strips
Pages: 321, including the introduction and index.


I just finished reading the third volume of this great series being put together by Fantagraphic Books. This is probably one of the best comic strip collections coming out these days, and I cannot recommend it enough. I have read the first two volumes with great joy, and this one just continues the fun. Actually I thought I had written a note on the other two, but I guess I sort of lost track; however, I recommend the other two as well. This third volume includes an introduction by Matt Groening. This particular volume includes Linus's first words and Charlie Brown's first baseball humiliation among other little events in the lives of the Peanuts gang. The great thing about these books is reading the many strips that have not been republished since they came out for the first time in newspapers. The pace is excellent; readers can easily get lost in the book and finish it fast, or they can read it bit by bit. By the way, the volumes include a handy topic index so readers can find strips dealing with ghost costumes or with Lucy being a "fuss-budget." Public libraries should definitely add this to their collections; I think some academic libraries should as well, especially those with interests in popular culture. I know we are adding them to our collection. I am looking forward to volume four and the rest of the series.

Another post about annoying things: business buzzwords

Fans of the comic strip Dilbert are likely familiar with all the times the strip deals with business language. I was reminded of the comic strip when I came across this post in Adfreak linking to an article in Fortune about "Business Buzzwords That Make You Gag." I have actually heard a few of these at one time or another. The scary part for me is that some of them are often used in education; I knew administrators very fond of "dialoguing" with you to seek out "new paradigms" for that "vision" of the school. It is kind of creepy. Anyways, go over, read and cringe. Some of the comments people have left on both places add words. Maybe you can add your own words. And maybe I can write a book with the one I have heard.

Thursday, August 11, 2005

Some hints on how to think outside the search box

SearchEngine Watch, one of the various resources I use to keep up in my line of work, recently featured an article on "Thinking Outside the Search Box" with good ideas on how to do searching outside the usual use of a search engine. The author uses a search she did for a client to illustrate the process, and she does so step by step. She integrates tools like Technorati, a fee based database, and Wikipedia. I found it fascinating as it looked like putting together a puzzle, but it was her thinking process as she did it that I found most interesting. This is definitely worth reading. I think people can learn a trick or two. I know I did.